<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The futuristic design of all Gnome Apps!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://worldofgnome.org/the-futuristic-design-of-all-gnome-apps/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://worldofgnome.org/the-futuristic-design-of-all-gnome-apps/</link>
	<description>Just another GNOME blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Jun 2013 14:48:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://worldofgnome.org/the-futuristic-design-of-all-gnome-apps/#comment-5537</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2012 09:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://worldofgnome.org/?p=3349#comment-5537</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mint&#039;s Cinnamon is mostly just gnome-shell. Mint only has a few hipsters working on it, so they generally take 99% of their work from others. I&#039;m convinced that Lefebvre faggot is sipping cocktails in the Caribbean bought with his donation dollars.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mint&#8217;s Cinnamon is mostly just gnome-shell. Mint only has a few hipsters working on it, so they generally take 99% of their work from others. I&#8217;m convinced that Lefebvre faggot is sipping cocktails in the Caribbean bought with his donation dollars.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: timothy</title>
		<link>http://worldofgnome.org/the-futuristic-design-of-all-gnome-apps/#comment-1545</link>
		<dc:creator>timothy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2012 19:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://worldofgnome.org/?p=3349#comment-1545</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Who the hell uses gnome-shell for productivity anyway?  I would understand why Fedora would use gnome-shell but that is because Fedora is known for its Vanillaness.  If you look at the major distros:  Mint, Ubuntu, Zorin, Solus, Pinguy, NONE of these uses gnome-shell.  ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who the hell uses gnome-shell for productivity anyway?  I would understand why Fedora would use gnome-shell but that is because Fedora is known for its Vanillaness.  If you look at the major distros:  Mint, Ubuntu, Zorin, Solus, Pinguy, NONE of these uses gnome-shell.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luís de Sousa</title>
		<link>http://worldofgnome.org/the-futuristic-design-of-all-gnome-apps/#comment-1528</link>
		<dc:creator>Luís de Sousa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2012 06:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://worldofgnome.org/?p=3349#comment-1528</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have used Nautilus for more than 10 years. If it is really going to be defaced like this I&#039;ll have to quit it. It is just sad.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have used Nautilus for more than 10 years. If it is really going to be defaced like this I&#8217;ll have to quit it. It is just sad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Timothy</title>
		<link>http://worldofgnome.org/the-futuristic-design-of-all-gnome-apps/#comment-1526</link>
		<dc:creator>Timothy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2012 02:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://worldofgnome.org/?p=3349#comment-1526</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How is this in any way innovative?  Why is the gnome team following the same direction as Microsoft is going with Windows 8?  The tablet experience =!  desktop experience.  Merging the two experiences together improperly results in an unusable desktop.  The way apple merged OSX and iOS is proper because traditional features were not dropped.  For example, the bottom was not removed, Right click support was not removed( it was included by default), There wasn&#039;t a theme overhaul.  The default gnome theme just looks horrible.  Its very ugly.  oh and okay you guys included a screen capturing tool with NO audio support. ... wtf.  I hope gnjome dies before it reaches version 4.0]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How is this in any way innovative?  Why is the gnome team following the same direction as Microsoft is going with Windows 8?  The tablet experience =!  desktop experience.  Merging the two experiences together improperly results in an unusable desktop.  The way apple merged OSX and iOS is proper because traditional features were not dropped.  For example, the bottom was not removed, Right click support was not removed( it was included by default), There wasn&#8217;t a theme overhaul.  The default gnome theme just looks horrible.  Its very ugly.  oh and okay you guys included a screen capturing tool with NO audio support. &#8230; wtf.  I hope gnjome dies before it reaches version 4.0</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deckard_Cain</title>
		<link>http://worldofgnome.org/the-futuristic-design-of-all-gnome-apps/#comment-1517</link>
		<dc:creator>Deckard_Cain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2012 23:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://worldofgnome.org/?p=3349#comment-1517</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is crap. Really. If you want to implement this, then by all means do so but give the option to users to costumize the shell to their needs and preferences.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is crap. Really. If you want to implement this, then by all means do so but give the option to users to costumize the shell to their needs and preferences.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cliff Wells</title>
		<link>http://worldofgnome.org/the-futuristic-design-of-all-gnome-apps/#comment-1270</link>
		<dc:creator>Cliff Wells</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2012 23:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://worldofgnome.org/?p=3349#comment-1270</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When the main content is left-aligned, the user&#039;s focus is on the left?  Whodathunk.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When the main content is left-aligned, the user&#8217;s focus is on the left?  Whodathunk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: center for disease control</title>
		<link>http://worldofgnome.org/the-futuristic-design-of-all-gnome-apps/#comment-1112</link>
		<dc:creator>center for disease control</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2012 02:14:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://worldofgnome.org/?p=3349#comment-1112</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;center for disease control...&lt;/strong&gt;

The futuristic design of all Gnome Apps! &#124; woGue...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>center for disease control&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>The futuristic design of all Gnome Apps! | woGue&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elisandra</title>
		<link>http://worldofgnome.org/the-futuristic-design-of-all-gnome-apps/#comment-857</link>
		<dc:creator>Elisandra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2012 01:21:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://worldofgnome.org/?p=3349#comment-857</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[love the site, very nice and meaningful, keep it up.http://www.1001passagens.com]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>love the site, very nice and meaningful, keep it up.<a href="http://www.1001passagens.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.1001passagens.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexis Diavatis</title>
		<link>http://worldofgnome.org/the-futuristic-design-of-all-gnome-apps/#comment-656</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexis Diavatis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2012 14:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://worldofgnome.org/?p=3349#comment-656</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I checked on this but its author says is still under development (at least its PHP part) and therefore not ready for production. If we find an equal open source alternative for disqus, we  will obviously move on that. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I checked on this but its author says is still under development (at least its PHP part) and therefore not ready for production. If we find an equal open source alternative for disqus, we  will obviously move on that. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JakeDTH</title>
		<link>http://worldofgnome.org/the-futuristic-design-of-all-gnome-apps/#comment-650</link>
		<dc:creator>JakeDTH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2012 10:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://worldofgnome.org/?p=3349#comment-650</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This one: http://www.tildehash.com/comments.html is the only one I know of that is actually like Disqus, in that it&#039;s separated from the rest of the page&#039;s code, unlike WordPress&#039; (which I&#039;m not sure is actual Free Software).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This one: <a href="http://www.tildehash.com/comments.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.tildehash.com/comments.html</a> is the only one I know of that is actually like Disqus, in that it&#8217;s separated from the rest of the page&#8217;s code, unlike WordPress&#8217; (which I&#8217;m not sure is actual Free Software).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ScionicSpectre</title>
		<link>http://worldofgnome.org/the-futuristic-design-of-all-gnome-apps/#comment-641</link>
		<dc:creator>ScionicSpectre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2012 20:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://worldofgnome.org/?p=3349#comment-641</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Awesome. I&#039;ve had an eye on these mockups for a while- I just hope it doesn&#039;t take us too many years to get there. If so, much of this will seem like old news. I think having the modal dialogs makes perfect sense, as we already use them for these functions anyway. My parents and nieces use GNOME, and I&#039;m sure this will only make it easier for them.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome. I&#8217;ve had an eye on these mockups for a while- I just hope it doesn&#8217;t take us too many years to get there. If so, much of this will seem like old news. I think having the modal dialogs makes perfect sense, as we already use them for these functions anyway. My parents and nieces use GNOME, and I&#8217;m sure this will only make it easier for them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fewt</title>
		<link>http://worldofgnome.org/the-futuristic-design-of-all-gnome-apps/#comment-633</link>
		<dc:creator>Fewt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2012 15:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://worldofgnome.org/?p=3349#comment-633</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I often wonder if our FOSS desktop could possibly go any further backwards in design, and then I see something like this.  Dear GNOME team, you win at desktop design fail.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I often wonder if our FOSS desktop could possibly go any further backwards in design, and then I see something like this.  Dear GNOME team, you win at desktop design fail.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: osd</title>
		<link>http://worldofgnome.org/the-futuristic-design-of-all-gnome-apps/#comment-626</link>
		<dc:creator>osd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2012 10:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://worldofgnome.org/?p=3349#comment-626</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[nobody will ever complain that the interface looks like a tablet. people are complaining because the developers are starting to avoid use-cases that make no sense on tablets/they cannot implement well on tablets.
also i&#039;m fine if they remove functionality and screw the users, but they should do it without hiding behind design-religious flag.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nobody will ever complain that the interface looks like a tablet. people are complaining because the developers are starting to avoid use-cases that make no sense on tablets/they cannot implement well on tablets.<br />
also i&#8217;m fine if they remove functionality and screw the users, but they should do it without hiding behind design-religious flag.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: real life</title>
		<link>http://worldofgnome.org/the-futuristic-design-of-all-gnome-apps/#comment-625</link>
		<dc:creator>real life</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2012 08:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://worldofgnome.org/?p=3349#comment-625</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Realisitcally? Realistically I do not seen anyone doing real work on real computers in real firms getting their machines replaced with a laptop or tablet in the next 15 to 20 years. Come on fit two regular sized documents side by side on a screen and you know what I mean.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Realisitcally? Realistically I do not seen anyone doing real work on real computers in real firms getting their machines replaced with a laptop or tablet in the next 15 to 20 years. Come on fit two regular sized documents side by side on a screen and you know what I mean.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Asterisk</title>
		<link>http://worldofgnome.org/the-futuristic-design-of-all-gnome-apps/#comment-621</link>
		<dc:creator>Asterisk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2012 06:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://worldofgnome.org/?p=3349#comment-621</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Its design doesn&#039;t work great for anything.  It&#039;s oversimplified, functionally-constrained, and hides data and interface feedback behind too many layers of chrome.  It&#039;s only commonplace on phones and tablets due to the physical UI paradigms of those devices; if I wanted a desktop OS with full-screen applications and hidden functionality that can only be discovered by locating documentation, I&#039;d run DOS.

It&#039;s time for the visual artists to move into the background, and return UI design to industrial designers and people who think in terms of human/computer interaction.  ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its design doesn&#8217;t work great for anything.  It&#8217;s oversimplified, functionally-constrained, and hides data and interface feedback behind too many layers of chrome.  It&#8217;s only commonplace on phones and tablets due to the physical UI paradigms of those devices; if I wanted a desktop OS with full-screen applications and hidden functionality that can only be discovered by locating documentation, I&#8217;d run DOS.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s time for the visual artists to move into the background, and return UI design to industrial designers and people who think in terms of human/computer interaction.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexis Diavatis</title>
		<link>http://worldofgnome.org/the-futuristic-design-of-all-gnome-apps/#comment-618</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexis Diavatis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2012 03:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://worldofgnome.org/?p=3349#comment-618</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t know, because everyone uses it and it works fine. What are the alternatives? ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know, because everyone uses it and it works fine. What are the alternatives? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JakeDTH</title>
		<link>http://worldofgnome.org/the-futuristic-design-of-all-gnome-apps/#comment-616</link>
		<dc:creator>JakeDTH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2012 03:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://worldofgnome.org/?p=3349#comment-616</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Very awesome, I love the design.  People gonna say it looks like a tablet, what they don&#039;t understand is that its design works great for everything, phones, tablets, laptops, and the ancient desktop. Realistically, desktops will be replaced by laptops and laptops replaced by tablets... and a phone is always gonna be phone. All the GNOME developers: Keep up the GOOD work!

P.S. Disqus is proprietary and Software as a Service, why are you using it when there are free alternatives?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very awesome, I love the design.  People gonna say it looks like a tablet, what they don&#8217;t understand is that its design works great for everything, phones, tablets, laptops, and the ancient desktop. Realistically, desktops will be replaced by laptops and laptops replaced by tablets&#8230; and a phone is always gonna be phone. All the GNOME developers: Keep up the GOOD work!</p>
<p>P.S. Disqus is proprietary and Software as a Service, why are you using it when there are free alternatives?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guest</title>
		<link>http://worldofgnome.org/the-futuristic-design-of-all-gnome-apps/#comment-613</link>
		<dc:creator>Guest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2012 02:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://worldofgnome.org/?p=3349#comment-613</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is this means gnome developer finally want to make thumbnails view in Gnome/GTK-File-chooser? But i only see list view in http://worldofgnome.org/nautilus-extreme-makeover/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is this means gnome developer finally want to make thumbnails view in Gnome/GTK-File-chooser? But i only see list view in <a href="http://worldofgnome.org/nautilus-extreme-makeover/" rel="nofollow">http://worldofgnome.org/nautilus-extreme-makeover/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: osd</title>
		<link>http://worldofgnome.org/the-futuristic-design-of-all-gnome-apps/#comment-606</link>
		<dc:creator>osd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2012 23:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://worldofgnome.org/?p=3349#comment-606</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[All the recent changes to nautilus are really discomforting. I&#039;ll probably stick to gnome if none of my extensions broke during the 3.6 upgrade and ubuntu decide to fork nautilus; but this &quot;we know better&quot; philosophy is really getting annoyinig.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All the recent changes to nautilus are really discomforting. I&#8217;ll probably stick to gnome if none of my extensions broke during the 3.6 upgrade and ubuntu decide to fork nautilus; but this &#8220;we know better&#8221; philosophy is really getting annoyinig.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: madjr</title>
		<link>http://worldofgnome.org/the-futuristic-design-of-all-gnome-apps/#comment-604</link>
		<dc:creator>madjr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2012 20:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://worldofgnome.org/?p=3349#comment-604</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[well we have plenty of desktop UIs, so we need UIs for tablets or hybrids, because am pretty sure that after windows8 more and more computers will look more like the ms surface and less like laptops.

crazy times I know, but i guess someone has to do it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well we have plenty of desktop UIs, so we need UIs for tablets or hybrids, because am pretty sure that after windows8 more and more computers will look more like the ms surface and less like laptops.</p>
<p>crazy times I know, but i guess someone has to do it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk
Object Caching 336/383 objects using disk

 Served from: worldofgnome.org @ 2013-06-18 07:18:12 by W3 Total Cache -->