Comments on: Oops!… I crashed it again ;)

By: Links 18/7/2012: KDE Workspaces 4.9, Raspbian | Techrights

Links 18/7/2012: KDE Workspaces 4.9, Raspbian | Techrights — Thu, 19 Jul 2012 00:29:05 +0000

[...] Oops!… I crashed it again [...]

By: Bilbo Baggins

Bilbo Baggins — Sun, 15 Jul 2012 20:15:00 +0000

Kudos for Britney video!!! =) lol

By: Philip Witte

Philip Witte — Sat, 14 Jul 2012 20:32:00 +0000

Simple names make sense, it’s informs you of Function rather than product. A simple solution to what you’re talking about would be for each App to have a “Online Help” option in a right-click drop down, or something along those lines.

By: thubett

thubett — Sat, 14 Jul 2012 16:43:00 +0000

Asked the same thing, see comments: http://worldofgnome.org/disk-usage-analyzer-353

Answer from Alexis Diavatis:
“You are definitely right about the wrong versioning I use, but 3.5.3 has many dots specially if you have to end with a dot. Also I hope to change this old dotting counting.

By: Ectogon

Ectogon — Sat, 14 Jul 2012 15:18:00 +0000

Is there a reason you keep dropping the dots from the version numbers? It’s really strange!

By: thubett

thubett — Sat, 14 Jul 2012 11:50:00 +0000

I really hate the application naming scheme which comes from smartphones. I think that applications should have an unique name and identity. For example if somebody is searching for help from google with name like “Files” or “Contacts”, I’m quite sure that nothing useful will be there. However these names will help new users to understand what the application do.

So I think it’s good if for example “Epiphany” is called “Web”, “Web browser” or “Browse web” in menu, why are they naming the application “Web”? And we already have elemetary os application named “Files”. So what are we going to call them? GNOME Files, Elementery Files? Files (GNOME), Files (Elementery)?

By: DoSerenity

DoSerenity — Sat, 14 Jul 2012 09:51:00 +0000

Nicely Designed! :)