<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Every Detail Matters 2 is open for Hacking!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://worldofgnome.org/every-detail-matters-2-is-open-for-hacking/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://worldofgnome.org/every-detail-matters-2-is-open-for-hacking/</link>
	<description>Just another GNOME blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 15:59:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gnome Shell Logout option comes back for single accounts &#124; woGue</title>
		<link>http://worldofgnome.org/every-detail-matters-2-is-open-for-hacking/#comment-4893</link>
		<dc:creator>Gnome Shell Logout option comes back for single accounts &#124; woGue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Nov 2012 12:48:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://worldofgnome.org/?p=12012#comment-4893</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] according to their original size (and creation time), so you can easier identify an application. We had print this when Allan present it as part of Every Details Matters project. Well, it is different reading something and trying it [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] according to their original size (and creation time), so you can easier identify an application. We had print this when Allan present it as part of Every Details Matters project. Well, it is different reading something and trying it [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Links 27/10/2012: KDE Plasma Active 3, Raspberry Pi WebIDE &#124; Techrights</title>
		<link>http://worldofgnome.org/every-detail-matters-2-is-open-for-hacking/#comment-4656</link>
		<dc:creator>Links 27/10/2012: KDE Plasma Active 3, Raspberry Pi WebIDE &#124; Techrights</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2012 16:30:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://worldofgnome.org/?p=12012#comment-4656</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Every Detail Matters 2 is open for Hacking! [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Every Detail Matters 2 is open for Hacking! [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: foobar</title>
		<link>http://worldofgnome.org/every-detail-matters-2-is-open-for-hacking/#comment-4647</link>
		<dc:creator>foobar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2012 02:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://worldofgnome.org/?p=12012#comment-4647</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[jhbuild is pretty much a helper that builds (with the right setting) the package you want to hack on and all dependencies for you. It is nice in case you want to work on a application needing newer library versions as you have installed. It is unfortunately not always trouble-free to use but quite helpful when you get used to it.


It really depends on the package you want to hack on. Several libs and project wont use recently added symbols anyway.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>jhbuild is pretty much a helper that builds (with the right setting) the package you want to hack on and all dependencies for you. It is nice in case you want to work on a application needing newer library versions as you have installed. It is unfortunately not always trouble-free to use but quite helpful when you get used to it.</p>
<p>It really depends on the package you want to hack on. Several libs and project wont use recently added symbols anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alex285</title>
		<link>http://worldofgnome.org/every-detail-matters-2-is-open-for-hacking/#comment-4646</link>
		<dc:creator>alex285</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2012 23:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://worldofgnome.org/?p=12012#comment-4646</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[JHBuild is needed for building (and running) an isolated (from your current) Gnome version from Gnome Git. It is meant for those that doing &quot;core&quot; Gnome Development (typically on the next Gnome Version, i.e. 3.8). You can build only the package you are working on, plus the dependencies. 


Personally I think building next Gnome in a Rawhide is easier. And I say personally, because obviously I don&#039;t know how to use JHBuild. I just tried once yesterday :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JHBuild is needed for building (and running) an isolated (from your current) Gnome version from Gnome Git. It is meant for those that doing &#8220;core&#8221; Gnome Development (typically on the next Gnome Version, i.e. 3.8). You can build only the package you are working on, plus the dependencies. </p>
<p>Personally I think building next Gnome in a Rawhide is easier. And I say personally, because obviously I don&#8217;t know how to use JHBuild. I just tried once yesterday :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: w1ngnut</title>
		<link>http://worldofgnome.org/every-detail-matters-2-is-open-for-hacking/#comment-4645</link>
		<dc:creator>w1ngnut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2012 22:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://worldofgnome.org/?p=12012#comment-4645</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Really? Was planning to setup UGR but if it&#039;s that nighmare, what&#039;s next? jhbuild is essential to build it? Do we need to build it all or just the package we&#039;re working on?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really? Was planning to setup UGR but if it&#8217;s that nighmare, what&#8217;s next? jhbuild is essential to build it? Do we need to build it all or just the package we&#8217;re working on?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alex285</title>
		<link>http://worldofgnome.org/every-detail-matters-2-is-open-for-hacking/#comment-4632</link>
		<dc:creator>alex285</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2012 11:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://worldofgnome.org/?p=12012#comment-4632</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yesterday I managed to run GS with JHBuild - o/ - in UGR..It took me like 3 hours :) I spend another 5-6 hours to try to build GCCenter, with no luck :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yesterday I managed to run GS with JHBuild &#8211; o/ &#8211; in UGR..It took me like 3 hours :) I spend another 5-6 hours to try to build GCCenter, with no luck :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: foobar</title>
		<link>http://worldofgnome.org/every-detail-matters-2-is-open-for-hacking/#comment-4627</link>
		<dc:creator>foobar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2012 01:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://worldofgnome.org/?p=12012#comment-4627</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Doesn&#039;t matter, you wont get around jhbuild anyway. Believe me, I tried. :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doesn&#8217;t matter, you wont get around jhbuild anyway. Believe me, I tried. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alex285</title>
		<link>http://worldofgnome.org/every-detail-matters-2-is-open-for-hacking/#comment-4626</link>
		<dc:creator>alex285</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2012 23:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://worldofgnome.org/?p=12012#comment-4626</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I guess Fedora is a better choice if you are going to do Gnome developing.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess Fedora is a better choice if you are going to do Gnome developing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: w1ngnut</title>
		<link>http://worldofgnome.org/every-detail-matters-2-is-open-for-hacking/#comment-4625</link>
		<dc:creator>w1ngnut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2012 23:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://worldofgnome.org/?p=12012#comment-4625</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I want to contribute to this project. As soon as I get an operational ubuntu at home will dive into this. Great initiative!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I want to contribute to this project. As soon as I get an operational ubuntu at home will dive into this. Great initiative!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alex285</title>
		<link>http://worldofgnome.org/every-detail-matters-2-is-open-for-hacking/#comment-4621</link>
		<dc:creator>alex285</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2012 19:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://worldofgnome.org/?p=12012#comment-4621</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good times ahead indeed :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good times ahead indeed :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stiph</title>
		<link>http://worldofgnome.org/every-detail-matters-2-is-open-for-hacking/#comment-4619</link>
		<dc:creator>Stiph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2012 18:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://worldofgnome.org/?p=12012#comment-4619</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is a very nice way to attract new developers and improve all those little (or bigger) bits the main developers do not have time to work on.
I&#039;m tempted to contribute myself, I just have to find something easy enough.

I&#039;ve been developing a gnome-shell extension (in JS), and the platform is really faster to develop with for newcomers than C because of IDE shortcomings. Of course, this is because of tradeoffs on autocompletion and assistance as there is no compilation, no debugging, etc. But globally, I think the learning curve is lower, and the maintenance is about equal (I will not say easier, as I have no mean of testing regression except testing everything, and there is no unit tests for extensions which is the only solution for robustness in runtime environments -but, the code is wa~~~~y shorter).

Good times ahead!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a very nice way to attract new developers and improve all those little (or bigger) bits the main developers do not have time to work on.<br />
I&#8217;m tempted to contribute myself, I just have to find something easy enough.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been developing a gnome-shell extension (in JS), and the platform is really faster to develop with for newcomers than C because of IDE shortcomings. Of course, this is because of tradeoffs on autocompletion and assistance as there is no compilation, no debugging, etc. But globally, I think the learning curve is lower, and the maintenance is about equal (I will not say easier, as I have no mean of testing regression except testing everything, and there is no unit tests for extensions which is the only solution for robustness in runtime environments -but, the code is wa~~~~y shorter).</p>
<p>Good times ahead!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 265/267 objects using disk: basic

Served from: worldofgnome.org @ 2013-05-20 00:48:11 -->