<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Epiphany gets a speed dial overview!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://worldofgnome.org/epiphany-gets-a-speed-dial-overview/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://worldofgnome.org/epiphany-gets-a-speed-dial-overview/</link>
	<description>Just another GNOME blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 08:50:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob</title>
		<link>http://worldofgnome.org/epiphany-gets-a-speed-dial-overview/#comment-2865</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Sep 2012 14:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://worldofgnome.org/?p=8185#comment-2865</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is looks nice. I hope that they also add a button to open a new tab.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is looks nice. I hope that they also add a button to open a new tab.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian Brunelli</title>
		<link>http://worldofgnome.org/epiphany-gets-a-speed-dial-overview/#comment-2694</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Brunelli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2012 14:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://worldofgnome.org/?p=8185#comment-2694</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It seems like they will make Chrome and Firefox extensions compatible with Epiphany :D]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems like they will make Chrome and Firefox extensions compatible with Epiphany :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alex285</title>
		<link>http://worldofgnome.org/epiphany-gets-a-speed-dial-overview/#comment-2605</link>
		<dc:creator>alex285</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2012 21:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://worldofgnome.org/?p=8185#comment-2605</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oh thanks for sharing. I knew only three.js]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh thanks for sharing. I knew only three.js</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ScionicSpectre</title>
		<link>http://worldofgnome.org/epiphany-gets-a-speed-dial-overview/#comment-2604</link>
		<dc:creator>ScionicSpectre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2012 21:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://worldofgnome.org/?p=8185#comment-2604</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oh, I get it (brain-fart). I&#039;m using Three.js and experimenting with Ammo.js and Physijs. I&#039;m surprised at how robust it is for such a young library.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, I get it (brain-fart). I&#8217;m using Three.js and experimenting with Ammo.js and Physijs. I&#8217;m surprised at how robust it is for such a young library.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alex285</title>
		<link>http://worldofgnome.org/epiphany-gets-a-speed-dial-overview/#comment-2596</link>
		<dc:creator>alex285</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2012 21:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://worldofgnome.org/?p=8185#comment-2596</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am not asking what are you building, but what framework are you using for webgl :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not asking what are you building, but what framework are you using for webgl :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ScionicSpectre</title>
		<link>http://worldofgnome.org/epiphany-gets-a-speed-dial-overview/#comment-2595</link>
		<dc:creator>ScionicSpectre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2012 20:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://worldofgnome.org/?p=8185#comment-2595</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m using Firefox and Chrome to test WebGL, since they seem to be the most performant, although I do test against the latest Firefox on Android to see how much (or little) WebGL&#039;s performance improves on mobile platforms. What I&#039;m working on in WebGL specifically I&#039;m not at liberty to say.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m using Firefox and Chrome to test WebGL, since they seem to be the most performant, although I do test against the latest Firefox on Android to see how much (or little) WebGL&#8217;s performance improves on mobile platforms. What I&#8217;m working on in WebGL specifically I&#8217;m not at liberty to say.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alex285</title>
		<link>http://worldofgnome.org/epiphany-gets-a-speed-dial-overview/#comment-2592</link>
		<dc:creator>alex285</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2012 20:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://worldofgnome.org/?p=8185#comment-2592</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[None like flash, not even Adobe :) What are you using for WebGL ?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>None like flash, not even Adobe :) What are you using for WebGL ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zsolt</title>
		<link>http://worldofgnome.org/epiphany-gets-a-speed-dial-overview/#comment-2590</link>
		<dc:creator>Zsolt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2012 20:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://worldofgnome.org/?p=8185#comment-2590</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It could be a great browser, but it really needs some sort of addon system with more stuff, or a Firefox addon or Chrome extension compatibility layer. Currently I&#039;m on Firefox with addons like HTTPS-Everywhere + HTTPS Finder, GoogleSharing, an is.gd shortener, a long URL revealer, PrivacyChoice TrackerBlock. These are the addons that are not browser usability related ones. It&#039;d nice to use them in Epiphany.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It could be a great browser, but it really needs some sort of addon system with more stuff, or a Firefox addon or Chrome extension compatibility layer. Currently I&#8217;m on Firefox with addons like HTTPS-Everywhere + HTTPS Finder, GoogleSharing, an is.gd shortener, a long URL revealer, PrivacyChoice TrackerBlock. These are the addons that are not browser usability related ones. It&#8217;d nice to use them in Epiphany.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ScionicSpectre</title>
		<link>http://worldofgnome.org/epiphany-gets-a-speed-dial-overview/#comment-2588</link>
		<dc:creator>ScionicSpectre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2012 20:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://worldofgnome.org/?p=8185#comment-2588</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oh, you mean TabCandy? Yes, this is similar, although it&#039;s not a very good experience. The layout and animations are just cludgy and uninspiring, and their concept for grouping tabs needs some work. However, you have to hand it to Firefox for being so flexible without looking crazy. These days I only really use Epiphany and Firefox unless I&#039;m doing web development (WebGL these days).


When Epiphany gets WebGL support and Flash dies, I probably won&#039;t use anything else. And yes, I am aware that you can wrap 32-bit Flash into Epiphany, but I think it runs better without Flash. ;)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, you mean TabCandy? Yes, this is similar, although it&#8217;s not a very good experience. The layout and animations are just cludgy and uninspiring, and their concept for grouping tabs needs some work. However, you have to hand it to Firefox for being so flexible without looking crazy. These days I only really use Epiphany and Firefox unless I&#8217;m doing web development (WebGL these days).</p>
<p>When Epiphany gets WebGL support and Flash dies, I probably won&#8217;t use anything else. And yes, I am aware that you can wrap 32-bit Flash into Epiphany, but I think it runs better without Flash. ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alex285</title>
		<link>http://worldofgnome.org/epiphany-gets-a-speed-dial-overview/#comment-2586</link>
		<dc:creator>alex285</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2012 20:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://worldofgnome.org/?p=8185#comment-2586</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That feature is on FF also since 1-2 years ago. But it doesn&#039;t work (at least the way it is). I am looking forward on it :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That feature is on FF also since 1-2 years ago. But it doesn&#8217;t work (at least the way it is). I am looking forward on it :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ScionicSpectre</title>
		<link>http://worldofgnome.org/epiphany-gets-a-speed-dial-overview/#comment-2583</link>
		<dc:creator>ScionicSpectre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2012 20:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://worldofgnome.org/?p=8185#comment-2583</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tabs up top- the ones that contain individual webpages. These are to be replaced by the Pages button which shows thumbnails in the overview instead of a persistent tabs list (similar to how we have an overview for windows instead of a window list or persistent dock).


This way people can visualize what tabs are open more immediately, rather than looking at a favicon and a title and hoping they click the right one (again, this is almost identical to the issue with a window list vs. scaled overview). Of course, shortcuts like Ctrl+Tab will still be available to instantly switch between open pages without going to the overview. This page explains more of why this is changing; https://live.gnome.org/Design/Web/Tabs]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tabs up top- the ones that contain individual webpages. These are to be replaced by the Pages button which shows thumbnails in the overview instead of a persistent tabs list (similar to how we have an overview for windows instead of a window list or persistent dock).</p>
<p>This way people can visualize what tabs are open more immediately, rather than looking at a favicon and a title and hoping they click the right one (again, this is almost identical to the issue with a window list vs. scaled overview). Of course, shortcuts like Ctrl+Tab will still be available to instantly switch between open pages without going to the overview. This page explains more of why this is changing; <a href="https://live.gnome.org/Design/Web/Tabs" rel="nofollow">https://live.gnome.org/Design/Web/Tabs</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alex285</title>
		<link>http://worldofgnome.org/epiphany-gets-a-speed-dial-overview/#comment-2581</link>
		<dc:creator>alex285</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2012 19:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://worldofgnome.org/?p=8185#comment-2581</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Which tabs are you referring to?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Which tabs are you referring to?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ScionicSpectre</title>
		<link>http://worldofgnome.org/epiphany-gets-a-speed-dial-overview/#comment-2579</link>
		<dc:creator>ScionicSpectre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2012 19:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://worldofgnome.org/?p=8185#comment-2579</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We really need the overview to be complete to replace the tabs, as they&#039;re a little difficult to work right now for a regular user. A menuitem and shortcut aren&#039;t obvious enough to use for something as central as adding a new tab- a simple plus sign would suffice. Of course, since tabs are going away, it wouldn&#039;t make too much sense to add something that would be removed in 6 months.


I still use Epiphany for almost everything, but it will be nice when the interface is complete.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We really need the overview to be complete to replace the tabs, as they&#8217;re a little difficult to work right now for a regular user. A menuitem and shortcut aren&#8217;t obvious enough to use for something as central as adding a new tab- a simple plus sign would suffice. Of course, since tabs are going away, it wouldn&#8217;t make too much sense to add something that would be removed in 6 months.</p>
<p>I still use Epiphany for almost everything, but it will be nice when the interface is complete.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian Brunelli</title>
		<link>http://worldofgnome.org/epiphany-gets-a-speed-dial-overview/#comment-2560</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Brunelli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2012 13:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://worldofgnome.org/?p=8185#comment-2560</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Exactly!
I hope yes, but think they will include some new features and leave the redesign to 4.0.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exactly!<br />
I hope yes, but think they will include some new features and leave the redesign to 4.0.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alex285</title>
		<link>http://worldofgnome.org/epiphany-gets-a-speed-dial-overview/#comment-2558</link>
		<dc:creator>alex285</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2012 12:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://worldofgnome.org/?p=8185#comment-2558</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The features in Brian Robles YouTube link, was to be included in 3.4. Then they postponed for 3.6. So there are plans to be included in 3.8. But will they?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The features in Brian Robles YouTube link, was to be included in 3.4. Then they postponed for 3.6. So there are plans to be included in 3.8. But will they?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian Brunelli</title>
		<link>http://worldofgnome.org/epiphany-gets-a-speed-dial-overview/#comment-2556</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Brunelli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2012 12:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://worldofgnome.org/?p=8185#comment-2556</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Someone know if they are planning to make this new redesign in version 3.8?
I hoped that it would be in 3.6, but will not.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Someone know if they are planning to make this new redesign in version 3.8?<br />
I hoped that it would be in 3.6, but will not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Robles</title>
		<link>http://worldofgnome.org/epiphany-gets-a-speed-dial-overview/#comment-2555</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Robles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2012 12:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://worldofgnome.org/?p=8185#comment-2555</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I believe the assumption is that this will be much more than a simple speed dial in future iterations. See http://youtu.be/b2VALT-DMGU]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe the assumption is that this will be much more than a simple speed dial in future iterations. See <a href="http://youtu.be/b2VALT-DMGU" rel="nofollow">http://youtu.be/b2VALT-DMGU</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: comment</title>
		<link>http://worldofgnome.org/epiphany-gets-a-speed-dial-overview/#comment-2554</link>
		<dc:creator>comment</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2012 11:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://worldofgnome.org/?p=8185#comment-2554</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why not copy code from Chromium? it&#039;s open source.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why not copy code from Chromium? it&#8217;s open source.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 342/344 objects using disk: basic

Served from: worldofgnome.org @ 2013-05-25 09:20:59 -->